Friday, May 15, 2015

Katie Hafner: A Letter to Sheryl Sandberg

Katie Hafner: Journalist (@NYTimes mostly), Internet historian, book author (#MotherDaughterMe paperback just out ). And daily solutions to #FirstWorldProblems.


A Letter to Sheryl Sandberg.

"Dear Sheryl,


My heart aches for you, even more because the same thing happened to me. You will get through it. But you never will get past it. I was so very sorry to hear about your husband’s death. You must be inundated with condolence letters and here I am, adding one more to the pile.

I write from a position of knowing, which makes me unspeakably sad for you. My own husband, Matthew Lyon, died in 2002, while on a business trip. He died suddenly, on a treadmill in the gym of a Seattle hotel. He was 45. Our daughter was eight. Nobody plans for this. We would all go insane if we did. Because we live life as if we have time. Here is what I can tell you: From now until forever — a forever your husband will not get to share with you, which contributes to the pain of this — you will question everything you thought was true about your life. Your trust in everyone’s ability to get from A to B without incident will never be the same. 
We all know that nothing is certain, but we know it in a vague, theoretical, I’ll-think-hard-about-that-tomorrow way. You now know it as established fact, and this changes the way you see everything. People will tell you that time will heal. This is true, but only in part. You and I — and the thousands of others who have lost our spouses suddenly — wind up walking through a world washed grey with grief. The fact of his sudden death will nag and tug, and sometimes it will feel stuck in your throat. You might even have trouble swallowing. There’s a medical term for it — globus hystericus, and I had it for weeks after my husband died. I called it my “grief lump.” It will go away.
When you go outside, the world will seem somehow out of joint. How can people still be walking their dogs, standing on street corners laughing with a friend while waiting for the light to change, jogging with their earbuds in, carrying their Starbucks cups? Don’t they know?
There will be self-recriminations. You might think about the last conversation you had with him, and wish you had said something else. You’ll think about the last conversation that your kids had with him. (They will too, over and over.) These are the things over which we have no control.
Yet there are many things over which you do have control. The well-worn advice about waiting a year to make any big changes is the best advice of all.
And here are a few other things. Once you are no longer distracted by the oddly pacifying logistics of death — the funeral, the letters to read and respond to, the countless floral arrangements, and, in your case, the thousands of beautiful memories of your husband shared on Facebook— you will be left to deal with everything that hangs in suspended animation; a modern, intensely personal version of Pompeii. You will have his voice mails on your phone. You will have his computer, containing the poetry of his life. You will have to decide whether to read his personal email (my advice: don’t). You may discover things he never told you. Love him all the more for this.
How the next weeks, months, and years go for you will be colored deeply by the most personal details of your life, your outlook, your resources (wealth, of course, but far more than that — wealth can help with the nuts and bolts but is no help at all for much of this).
Here are some recommendations that, I think, are universally helpful. First, let people take care of you. Have a few people around at all times. Don’t allow yourself to be alone, especially at night.
Everyone will have a lot to say to you. Every once in a while someone will say something strangely insensitive, perhaps even hurtful. Remember that what they are saying is about them, not your husband, and definitely not you. And, for the most part, they are trying to help. Just as you didn’t prepare for this moment, neither did they. Be forgiving.

Matthew Lyon, with daughter Zoe, 1996

And everyone will want to help. Let them. Delegate. Allow your friends and family to deal with his death certificate, his frequent flyer account, his cell phone. But don’t delegate your children. Keep them close to you as much as you can. Because in the way children have of squaring themselves with the world, they figure if they could lose him so suddenly, then you too are up for grabs.
In a few weeks after everyone who has flown in from all parts has left, it will get worse. Because you will find yourself sitting with just yourself. You might think you’re fine, that you can go back to work. You are clearly a remarkably self-sufficient person, and your fame has come, partly, from helping women find their inner confidence. But then something will happen — you might receive a bill from the hospital that tried to save him addressed to him — and you will fall to pieces all over again.
When you drop your children off places, as they are getting out of the car they might say to you, “Promise you won’t die.” With this, they’ll mean, “Don’t die today.” And you won’t be able to make that promise. Tell them you will do your very best not to die today, or tomorrow, or any time soon. And hug them close.
Know that a child’s grief is ineffable, complicated, and unpredictable. Adults do predictable things: we cry, we experience an unfillable hole in our hearts yet we are able to articulate that; we feel and express our pain, our anger, our guilt. We feel and carry through on a need to tell people how it happened, and with each re-enactment we are working our way through to the other side. If we are in a fog, we are conscious of our fog. Then we emerge and carry on. We get up in the morning, take a shower, drink coffee, get dressed, put on makeup. Yet we’re bloodied and bandaged inside.
Our children’s insides roil too, but in a way they cannot comprehend or confront. Go, immediately, and find a grief therapist. My daughter’s therapist saved her life. At least that’s what she and I tell ourselves.
Your children will eventually stop remembering their father in the deep way that you do. Their memories will be airbrushed, in both directions — sometimes adding heroic myth, sometimes colored by anger or confusion. And the memories they do have won’t necessarily jibe with what you remember.
And one day, you will wake up and say to yourself, “My kids are okay.”
My daughter is 21, and she is fine. And I am now happily remarried, to a wonderfully compassionate man (who, in fact, suggested I write this letter to you). Yet when I remember that Zoe’s father won’t be here to see her graduate from college in two weeks, I want to kick a wall. And no, he is not here in spirit.
Here’s the oddest thing: I’m thirteen years into this and still my husband’s visage comes to my mind’s eye unbidden. Even in the broken light in which he appears, I can see that he hasn’t changed a bit.
You have helped millions of women with your advice. I hope mine is helpful to you in this terrible moment. Please know that I am thinking of you every day and for many days yet to come.
Love, Katie"

Friday, April 04, 2014

The rich are always immoral - according to Jean

140404

A friend, Jean Bosco Walsh posted the "Money is the root of evils" (see below) article from "Upworthy".

http://www.upworthy.com/take-two-normal-people-add-money-to-just-one-of-them-and-watch-what-happens-next?c=ufb3

I commented on her Facebook:

"Wow! Should we tell our children to quit school, advise them to take hard drugs, drink at a young age, live in ghetto or on the streets, get in and out of jail, be dirt-poor and subsist on welfare... so that they will somehow and automatically be more honest? This kind of "studies" is junk, anecdotal and lacking of statistical understanding. These sloppy "experiments" with problematic sample size and population, incorrect inference and poor regression analysis imply ludicrously that an indigent person is (always or most probably) more honest than a "Bill Gates"! Correlation does not imply causation: a BMW driver who did not stop for pedestrians could be a teenager jerk and not because he/she is rich!!!"


Jean Bosco Walsh I wonder if you saw the monopoly game part of the video? your way jumping in correlation. ... not this study...


Michael Wyn " I watched the entire video. The monopoly game had too many variables (age, gender, population, sample size, location...) to be statistically significant. Several years ago a study claimed an increase of cancer incidents of children living under or nearpower line. Regression analysis identified the flawed methodology: most of the subjects in the study were poor, unhealthy children who also were living near or under power lines. Being poor does not make you virtuous."

Jean Bosco Walsh 30 studies on thousands......?? There are many flawed research studies to point to... just not sure it is relevant with this.... Let's play the rigged monopoly game , I bet we would both change given some time in our positions.... human nature....

Michael Wyn "Power line causes cancer. Vaccinations trigger autism. UFO's in Area 51. Flat earth. Fake moon landing. Money brings immorality. Conspiracies...: all have been soundly discredited. Human morality is not formed by how much money we have or have not. It is instilled by our upbringing, our family, friends and peers we have, inner strength to know right from wrong and our continuing daily assessment of our life. Throughout history there have been lots of noble wealthy folks and absolutely horrible poverty-stricken despicable characters."



Jean Bosco Walsh I know there are a lot of rich people who do good things with their money... got it.(And the video even showed some who made the pledge..... point of the study is the title..... "Take two normal....." Have you read the book "Only the super rich can save us" by Ralph Nader? It's a novel ... so don't start arguing facts with me!.

Michael Wyn I am glad that you agree with me and that you don't like facts!  There are many sensational one-liners and sound bites which are misleading and wrong. Who and what are two "normal" people? Are these mathematically average or median? Where do we find them? Are they randomly picked from (name your favorite town/locale: ghettos, Beverly Hills, rural or Harvard university, ... )? re. Ralph Nader: Isn't he a bit anachronistic?


Saturday, March 08, 2014

Science and faith

Notes from last several months. 

I have been engaging in a short online discussion with several young physicians (friends of Amy) who believe that God can be found through logic and intellectual inquiry. I believe that is not possible. Saying that I don't like/want to eat broccoli is not a matter for
scientific inquiry. Faith is believing and from some other reference frame it can
look quite illogical, unscientific and maddening. The Bible is not a history nor scientific
book. Folks who try to fit it into an engineering/scientific framework do not
understand science nor Faith. There have been attempts to make religion more
"respectable" by cover it under a scientific/intellectual facade. A famous quote:

"Live a good life. If there are gods and they are just, then they will not care how devout you have been, but will welcome you based on the virtues you have lived by. If there are gods, but unjust, then you should not want to worship them. If there are no gods, then you will be gone, but will have lived a noble life that will live on in the memories of your loved ones.”

― Marcus Aurelius, Meditations

These young physicians sent me this link:

http://www.spiritscienceandmetaphysics.com/scientists-claim-that-quantum-theory-proves-consciousness-moves-to-another-universe-at-death/

My response: 

This is not science. It is speculation. There is no evidence of life after death. Quantum physics says nothing about "consciousness moves to another Universe at death"! Please see http://www.skepdic.com/nde.html (and many reputable other sources) in which "....(scientists) attribute the feelings of extreme peacefulness of the NDE to the release of endorphins in response to the extreme stress of the situation. The buzzing or ringing sound is attributed to cerebral anoxia and consequent effects upon the connections between brain cells (op. cit., 64).

Dr. Karl Jansen has reproduced NDEs with ketamine, a short-acting hallucinogenic, dissociative anesthetic.

The anesthesia is the result of the patient being so 'dissociated' and 'removed from their body' that it is possible to carry out surgical procedures. This is wholly different from the 'unconsciousness' produced by conventional anesthetics, although ketamine is also an excellent analgesic (pain killer) by a different route (i.e. not due to dissociation). Ketamine is related to phencyclidine (PCP). Both drugs are arylcyclohexylamines - they are not opioids and are not related to LSD. In contrast to PCP, ketamine is relatively safe, is much shorter acting, is an uncontrolled drug in most countries, and remains in use as an anaesthetic for children in industrialised countries and all ages in the third world as it is cheap and easy to use. Anaesthetists prevent patients from having NDE's ('emergence phenomena') by the co-administration of sedatives which produce 'true' unconsciousness rather than dissociation.* 

According to Dr. Jansen, ketamine can reproduce all the main features of the NDE, including travel through a dark tunnel into the light, the feeling that one is dead, communing with some god,..."

  • Michael Wyn I share your hope and wish that there is life after death. But as far as we know now the prospect does not look too good. I am more a skeptic and would like to see better evidence... before believing...
  • Radeyah Sos you're so smart
  • Amy Marcos if you mean Michael Wyn, he has to be heading a tech company !
  • Alvro Ramoz That's one informed fella.
  • David Ramos Michael interesting stuff. If you haven't already, you should look into DMT / dimethyltryptamine - it takes what you've described with Dr. Jansen to a much more profound level that dwarfs the outer body effects of those ketamine derivatives ... Science does not trump such speculation nor rule out the possibility of life after death - science has no greater weight than speculation when it comes to arguing over these grand questions of life / death. In my humble opinion, science as we know it is much speculation, especially when you're talking all this quantum physics stuff and are trying to understand reality, the universe, etc on that deep, relatively unknown level of research and science. If anything, the effects of the substances / drugs you've described, coupled with the sheer power of the brain, the mind, and how very little we know about it all, leads me to lean towards the supernatural rather than nothingness.
  • Michael Wyn Hi David: Thanks for your note. Science is based upon careful observations, empirical evidences and rigorous testings, typically across many disciplines by separate, independent and unbiased observers/scientists. The purpose of scientific study is to discover principle, rule(s) to support or contradict a theory. Science does not rely upon speculation. Bertrand Russell's teapot is the analogy to demand burden of proof upon speculation. Carl Sagan paraphrased as "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." Quantum physics is not speculative: in my work we have to adjust satellite atomic clocks regularly thanks to quantum effects and relativity; laser light demonstrates the quanta property of electromagnetic radiation, tunnel diodes are real.... Science cannot argue the possibility of life after death because proving a negative (example: prove that unicorns do not exist) is not possible nor is a scientific method. Science is "organic" meaning if there is evidence/discovery identifying a certain principle violating current understanding science will change. Anyone who identifies a person returning from real death will probably get an immediate Nobel prize in Medicine.
  • Amy Marcos Hold on ! let's bring a TED forum in here before we continue this thread 

Friday, April 05, 2013

Thoughtful Roger Ebert excerpt on death

Roger Ebert, film critic

"I know it is coming, and I do not fear it, because I believe there is nothing on the other side of death to fear. I hope to be spared as much pain as possible on the approach path. I was perfectly content before I was born, and I think of death as the same state. I am grateful for the gifts of intelligence, love, wonder and laughter. You can’t say it wasn’t interesting. My lifetime’s memories are what I have brought home from the trip. I will require them for eternity no more than that little souvenir of the Eiffel Tower I brought home from Paris.


Still, illness led me resolutely toward the contemplation of death. That led me to the subject of evolution, that most consoling of all the sciences, and I became engulfed on my blog in unforeseen discussions about God, the afterlife, religion, theory of evolution, intelligent design, reincarnation, the nature of reality, what came before the big bang, what waits after the end, the nature of intelligence, the reality of the self, death, death, death.
Many readers have informed me that it is a tragic and dreary business to go into death without faith. I don’t feel that way. “Faith” is neutral. All depends on what is believed in. I have no desire to live forever. The concept frightens me. I am 69, have had cancer, will die sooner than most of those reading this. That is in the nature of things. In my plans for life after death, I say, again with Whitman:
I bequeath myself to the dirt to grow from the grass I love,
If you want me again look for me under your boot-soles.
And with Will, the brother in Saul Bellow’s 'Herzog,' I say, 'Look for me in the weather reports.'
One of these days I will encounter what Henry James called on his deathbed “the distinguished thing.” I will not be conscious of the moment of passing."
Someday I will no longer call out, and there will be no heartbeat. I will be dead. What happens then? From my point of view, nothing. Absolutely nothing. All the same, as I wrote to Monica Eng, whom I have known since she was six, “You’d better cry at my memorial service.” I correspond with a dear friend, the wise and gentle Australian director Paul Cox. Our subject sometimes turns to death. In 2010 he came very close to dying before receiving a liver transplant. In 1988 he made a documentary named 'Vincent: The Life and Death of Vincent van Gogh.'  Paul told me that in those days, Vincent wrote:
Looking at the stars always makes me dream, as simply as I dream over the black dots representing towns and villages on a map.
Why, I ask myself, shouldn’t the shining dots of the sky be as accessible as the black dots on the map of France?
Just as we take a train to get to Tarascon or Rouen, we take death to reach a star. We cannot get to a star while we are alive any more than we can take the train when we are dead. So to me it seems possible that cholera, tuberculosis and cancer are the celestial means of locomotion. Just as steamboats, buses and railways are the terrestrial means.
To die quietly of old age would be to go there on foot."

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Nostalgia

It snows outside. The house is almost quiet except for soft whispers of the fire in the fireplace. For a while I sat in silence watching the snow outside the window gently falls onto the ground... I started and listened to  the sensual music of Dusty Springfield then Marianne Faithful... "If you go away", "You don't have to say you love me"  Dusty Springfield then Marianne Faithful's "As tears go by" brought much nostalgia; a gentle sadness came to me.

10am. Watched the rituals of the Catholic Church Conclave. It is filled with solemnity, unworldly beauty, ancient process, music and prayers in Latin. An incredibly picturesque pageantry with colorful Swiss guards, Michelangelo magnificent frescos in the Sistine Chapel.  No woman, though.

Thursday, June 28, 2012

For a happier life


Yesterday evening we saw “Happiness”, an excellent PBS special.
Dr. Tal Ben Shabar is a Harvard professor teaching class about happiness. His thesis of ingredients for a happy life includes:
Simplification of life. The many choices that we have bring confusion and chaos. He proposes that we ought to simplify our life with simple pleasures; perform less multi-tasking activities; take time out to recover from stress.
Positive acceptance. This is not passivity. Positive acceptance means to make choice based upon available information; learning from mistakes and move on.
Exercise. Referenced many medical studies, Tal Ben Shabar posits that regular physical exercise reduces stress, disease risks, … which will lead to a happier, healthier life.
Happiness can be learned.
Mindful meditation. The simplest daily exercise is the deep breathing method. More advanced mindful meditation will further relaxation, stress-reduction and many other benefits.
Focus on the positives. An attitude of gratitude concentrating upon all the good things in our life is an important element for a happy life.
Tal Ben Shabar has written several best-sellers including “Happier” and “Pursuit of Perfect”.

Thursday, April 19, 2012

Books...

I have been reading quite a bit. I have a Nook and a Kindle Fire
so it's quite handy to take books with us while traveling. The most 
recent books I enjoy are:

1. "Steve Jobs" by Walter Isaacson: A compelling story of a complex 
    human being.

2. "The Swerve: How the World Became Modern" by Stephen Greenblatt:
    An amazing story-telling of Western civilization to the Renaissance
    and Enlightenment.

3. "Knocking on Heaven's Door: How physics and Scientific Thinking illuminate
     the Universe and Modern World" by Lisa Randall. An explanation of
     the complex universe [or multi-verse] we live in from quantum physics
     to the cosmos. Highly recommended.


I really enjoy the free time to re-educate myself with books,
Netflix, magazines, newspapers, online Wikipedia,...

The difference I find that books [those I mentioned before] are much
more complex and are difficult to present in a different media such as
TV. I don't deny the power of visual presentations; we were quite
impressed with Netflix's "Downton Abbey" series and other
science programs from PBS. "Mao's last dancer" movie on Netflix
was also quite a powerful message. But it is not easy to present
ideas from "The Swerve" or Lisa Randall's "Touching Heaven's..."
books in video format.